El Noticiero de Alvarez Galloso

LA BBC Y LA CADENA DE TELEVISION WMUR INFORMARON QUE UN HOMBRE IRRUMPIO EN EL EDIFICIO DE LA CAMPA~NA DE CLINTON. EL HOMBRE ARMADO  TIENE COMO REHENES EN ESTE MOMENTO.  

Viviendo en Venezuela en ladecada de los 1970’s, he tenido el honor de disfrutar de RCTV y su programa “Radio Rochela”. Me moria de las risas en especial las satiras politicas. Extiendo mediante mi revista electronica una invitacion para una entrevista. Gracias.

He tenido el honor en morirme de la risa con NNN de Canal 2 de Nicaragua. Quiero extender una invitacion a NNN para ser entrevistado en mi revista electronica. Aunque las oligarquias de la izquierda y derecha dicen lo contrario, considero NNN uno de los mejores de la comedia. Por eso y mucho mas, extiendo mi invitacion. No pudo enviar un correo electronico por eso dedico este articulo y extiendo mi invitacion. Gracias.

Creo que existe un retroceso para el Continente Americano. Incluso los Republicanos y Democratas estan estudiando las “reformas” en Venezuela, Ecuador, y Bolivia para hacer lo mismo [una monarquia absoluta vestida de republica]. Para mi, creo que las ideologias deben ser reemplazado por el sentido comun.

Major League Soccer of the USA announced with the collaboration of the J League in Japan, and the Hyundai League of Australia; the inauguration of the 2008 Pan Pacific Championship. The 2008 Pan Pacific Championship will take place in Hawaii and will involve the teams of these leagues.

The dates for the 2008 Pan Pacific Championship will be from the 20^th of February 2008 to the 23^rd of February 2008. 

Two of the teams from the MLS to play in this inaugural championship will be the Houston Dynamos and the Los Angeles Galaxy.  

The Pan Pacific Championship will be the beginning of bigger and better things to come in football in 2008.   

La MLS con la Liga J [Japon] y la Liga Hyundai de Australia unieron sus esfuerzos para proclamar el inicio de los campeonatos Pan Pacifico para Febrero 2008. Hawaii sera el anfitrion del Primer Campeonato del Pacifico que sera entre el 20 de Febrero 2008 hasta el 23 de Febrero 2008. Dos de los equipos de la MLS que participaran seran la Galaxia de Los Angeles y los Dynamos de Houston.

DROGBA, CHELSEA, & ROSENBORG

Roberto managed to see some of the game and felt happy with Chelsea’s Victory. It seems as though Chelsea has been recidivated after undergoing agony in the wake of “The Great One’s” Departure.

Drogba stunned Rosenborg and the game was never the same. Regardless, Chelsea winning was like being in heaven on earth. It proves that the verse from Steve Miller’s Song “Jet Airliner” was right. Steve Miller sang: “You have to go through hell before you get to heaven”. Chelsea has just arrived at heaven for now.

Roberto esta contento con la victoria de Chelsea en su juego contra Rosenborg. Drogba mostro su talla con Chelsea haciendo una resurreccion como el Ave Fenix.

According to the US Soccer Foundation, David Beckham is sponsoring the FC Harlem in an attempt to empower the youths of Harlem and provide an alternative to the gangs and drugs that exist in Inner City Neighbourhoods in America. David Beckham deserves to be made Sports Personality of the Year.

Segun la Fundacion del Futbol [Balonpie] en EEUU, Beckham esta apoyando al Club Futbol de Harlem con el motivo de alejar a la juventud de los barrios marginados en Nueva York de las drogas y las pandillas. Por eso y mucho mas, Beckham merece el premio humanitario en el futbol.

REFERENCE:

US Soccer Foundation:“BECKHAM HELPS LAUNCH EFFORT FOR NEW SOCCER FIELD IN HARLEM”

http://www.ussoccerfoundation.org/site/c.gpLPJQOpHkE/b.2776421/apps/nl/content3.asp?content_id={97E2C72A-31BB-43C3-999D-9D3FC5253876}&notoc=1

Roberto,
 
Thanks for your interest & initiative in taking this forward.

Just for your information, the anticipated principal objection to this idea working in the real world is finding a manager who would be happy to have his starting eleven picked for him. Most would say that they defy to find any of the world’s chief tacticians & coaches who will want to surrender that duty. My response to this is that they are not managing a club side. The coach who would eventually be appointed would adher to the system being in place. It would stretch his technical nous & capabilities to the utmost but the element of picking the starting eleven is secondary. Look at the calibre & experience of a coach like Terry Venables taking instruction from a man with less experience. He did it because he wanted & loved to be involved in the England set up. He was asked to come on board not to pick the team but to apport his expertise & tactical nous.It was an honour to serve his country. The FA should only be concerned in appointing a top class football coach that is able to lead, inspire, motivate & prepare a starting eleven to win any match within a 22 man squad that the coach will be selecting any way.These players are supposedly the cream of all players in the country so if any of these players are not able to respond & perform to the coaches directives & mental preparation then they shouldn’t be there i.The selection of the final 11 to play is not the determining factor between a team winning or losing. The coach that would be appointed & worth his immense pay packet should be able to make a winning team from any final eleven selected & any tactical permutation within the 22.It is the coaches ability to lead once selection has taken place & mentally prepare the players to go out & win.  This directive alone should separate who are the best coaches out there. Manager’s egos are secondary to the importance of the national team & paying public’s choice.    Best regards,
 
David Woodland

Phillies at 12% in scientific national poll.

Several weeks ago, Phillies 2008 paid for a national poll. The

 telephone 

survey of 1000 Likely Voters was conducted by Pulse Opinion Research on

November 8 and 11, 2007. Pulse Opinion Research, LLC is an independent 

public opinion research firm using automated polling methodology and 

procedures licensed from Rasmussen Reports, LLC.

We asked about a two-candidate race and a three-candidate race.   To 

simulate voting conditions in November 2008, we supplied each voter

 with 

the candidate’s political party and a few of their key campaign 

promises.  For Hillary Clinton and Rudy Giuliani, we took their stands 

from their web sites.  Among other questions, we asked:

1) In thinking about the next Presidential election, suppose you had a 

choice between Republican Rudy Giuliani, who promises to cut taxes and 

win the war on terror and Democrat Hillary Clinton, who promises to 

strengthen the middle class and provide universal health care.  If the 

election were held today would you vote for Republican Rudy Giuliani or

Democrat Hillary Clinton?

2) Okay…suppose you had a choice between Republican Rudy Giuliani, 

Democrat Hillary Clinton and Libertarian George Phillies, who promises 

to end the War in Iraq, secure the borders and restore civil rights.

  If 

the election were held today would you vote for Republican Rudy 

Giuliani, Democrat Hillary Clinton or Libertarian George Phillies?

And the outcomes:

Question 1:

       Giuliani   39%

       Clinton    48%

       Some other candidate 9%

       Not Sure     4%

Question 2:

       Giuliani   34%

       Clinton    41%

       Phillies   12%

       Some other candidate 7%

       Not Sure     6%

Phillies comments on his poll

“That’s a polling result unprecedented in the history of Libertarian 

Presidential politics.

I’m polling in two digits.

Why is this happening?  It’s obviously not my trillion dollar ad 

campaign.  It’s certainly not my handsome looks.  No, it has to be the 

Phillies 2008 issues: end the War in Iraq, secure the borders, and 

restore civil rights.

First, some details from the demographic breakdowns, then what we need 

to do to make this happen.

Demographics:  I get 19% of the 19-29 year old vote. In the race 

breakdown, I get 21% of the black vote and 15% of the ‘other’ vote. 

Rumors that we are the rich conservative Republican clones are

 rejected: 

  I get 6% of the Republican vote and 10% of the Democratic vote.  I

 get 

10% of liberals and conservatives, and 17% of moderates.  I draw more 

from Clinton that from Giuliani.  And I do best (24% in that group) 

among the poorest (under $20,000 a year).

Twelve per cent? Is that result actually possible next November?

That poll question assumes voters know my name and a few stands. We

 need 

to make that happen.  To make it happen, we need to do two things:  We 

have to get my name out before the voters.  We have to get my issues

 out 

before the voters.  Thanks to the internet, WE CAN DO THIS!  It’s not 

free, but it’s not impossible any more.

Could another libertarian do the same?  It depends. I’m old enough to 

remember watching on television when President Eisenhower sent the 

Paratroops to Little Rock to desegregate the schools. A libertarian who

talks about “states rights”, the imagined right of an individual state 

to take away your rights–like your right to vote when your skin is the

wrong color–is for sure not getting 21% of the black vote. A candidate

who supports torture, and who opposes letting gay couples adopt or 

servicewomen pay for abortions with their own money, is not going to

 get 

young people, not once his opponents start talking about his issues.

This poll shows that my campaign’s message resonates with the voters. 

Can the other candidates make that claim?

According to Merinews [an Electronic Magazine in India] and the BBC, The Communist Government of West Bengal has been involved in a massacre of people in the southwest Calcutta Suburb of Nandigram.

People have protested the killings including intellectuals. The response of the Communist Party of India [M] Government of West Bengal was to attempt to kill the film director Aparna Sen or at least use scare tactics to prevent her from entering film festivals in Calcutta. Her “crime” was organizing the protests against the killings in Nandigram.

It must be remembered that India currently has a Congress Party/Communist Party of India Coalition Government. The Central Government in India has taken an interest in the case because of the coalition government and because India has said it would not tolerate “states within states”.

While the junior partners of the West Bengal Government lead by the Communist Party of India [M] states that the Communist Party of India [M] should be held responsible, the junior partners should be held responsible for their inaction up to the present time.

REFERENCE:

 Sarkar, Shyamal: Merinews: “Marxists train guns on filmmaker Aparna Sen”

http://www.merinews.com/catFull.jsp?articleID=128144

 Subir Bhaumik BBC News: “Marxists accused over Bengal ‘terror’ http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/south_asia/7114827.stm